The Snit List 

163 People Who Condemn Snit Michael Glasser's Psychopath Behaviors

This is the original URL, but it no longer works, because Google has trashed their Usenet system.

The other URLs below may not work either.

From: Steve Carroll 
Wonder how many people want you to stop being a lying hypocrite 
(who cries 'victim' every chance he gets)? Guess they'll all be
disappointed. Here are some of them now...

1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member
area and a login. If you forget your password, you can ask it
to e-mail it to you, and a bot will send an e-mail.  *That*
is the e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes he's
that fucked in the head and starved for attention that he'd
claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get
sucked into his little circus.  The e-mail, in this particular
instance, did probably originate from"  27 Feb 2007

2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed*
by behaviour and not withstanding your occasional on topic
posts, I wish you'd leave too. Please note that despite the
amazing silliness that is Edwin, I have never made the same
wish of him."  27 Feb 2005

3- amicus_curious (COLA): "Where on earth do you get the
idea that I am arguing with you, little man? Is your name
"Hadron"? Shoo! Go back to your mail order business!"
29 May 2011

4- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the
truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep
disrupting the newsgroup."  27 Feb 2005

5- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers
to weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole."
25 Jun 2007

6- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why
not just let them go away and show how responsible a member
of CSMA you are?  You could show your enemies up by being
better than them, rise above the low level you so obviously
dislike. Anything, just stop...."  26 Apr 2007

7- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If
yes, then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on
you set to expire, but it's fixed now."  13 Mar 2005

8- BaJoRi: "You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who
has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed
it to be wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick and
REALLY show you to be a fool.  You need to judiciously snip
out pertinent points because you are an intellectually dwarfed
turd-burglar."  11 Nov 2008

9- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this
group can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood
why more people don't do the same.."  5 Aug 2006

10- Bob B.: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all
group, but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible
to have a decent discussion about anything. The solution is
to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people just
can't stop feeding him."  27 Dec 2004

11- bunny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually 
=3D:-(   9 Oct 2004

12- Brian: "LOL, Has anyone ever been more universally hated on
the USENET than Snit? Too bad he craves the hatred and negative
attention.  We will read about him in the news some day soon
going on a shooting rampage. Somebody should get the pychopath
some help before he VT's a bunch of people.  29 May 2007

13- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill, but you and
Steve don't help. You encourage him to post, which he doesn't
need to do. We would all be better off if you just ignore him.
17 Nov 2004

14- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls'
... in the groups he trolls in, that is.  I wondered if the
idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I
didn't see his posts, only your reply".  07 Aug 2006

15- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time
for you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of
course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter."  5 Mar 2005

16- cc (COLA): "You are incapable of letting anything go. In
fact, I guarantee you will respond to this post in under 3
hours. Hell, I'd be surprised if it takes longer than 30
minutes. If I really wanted to, I could make this little
side topic go on forever, because you are a complete moron
who just has to respond to anything written about or to you,
even if it just means repeating yourself."  1 Feb 2010

17- Chance Furlong: "HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve
Carroll and Tim Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You,
on the other hand, are a troll."  27 Aug 2009

18- Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "I try to go more by the contents
of the posts. Although some clowns (e.g. Snit) spew out so
much chaff it is not worth the effort." 14 Feb 2010

Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "Actually, many of the advocates are
sick to death of Snit's never-ending puerile blather about
trivialities.  The occasional reasonable conversations are
too few and far between."  6 Mar 2011

19- Chris Clement: "ugh....geez man.....let it go"  5 Jul 2006

20- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so,
for they way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at
the bus depot, and simply refused to die, despite repeated
flushes.  It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can
still *plonk* him..."  12 Sep 2005

21- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for
you to "win" an argument? They don't like you, you don't
like them. Why must you keep this up? What results are you

22- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
archives show my answers and your inability to process
them. Keep posting your list and proving that you are an idiot
troll. I will not address it any further- you being too stupid
to realize and accept that is not my problem".  22 Nov 2007

23- cshenk: "I happen to believe him over you...  and I doubt
I'd be the only person in this ng to do so. You have given
people a lot of 'evidence' that you are dishonest... as
'evidenced' by the quotes list."  .... "Why stop with
Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your quotes
list 'liars'? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse."  27 Nov 2010

24- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care
to read] Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do
something, but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!!"  2 Jun 2006

25- Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux
advocates. Almost all of them are making similar claims about
Snit. When you have so many diverse people who share a common
perception where do you think the problem lies? With Snit? Or
almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an advanced
degree to figure out."  30 Dec 2004

26- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought
you knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it
was presented to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you."
30 Nov 2006

27- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar
and loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me
where i stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time,
then start up responding as if you were a normal person. i
suppose it's tough for the magnitude of your 'loserdom'
to stick, so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop
responding to you. you almost always start responding back
in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's once
again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences
to your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such
a dishonest fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser
as well, just pass those condolences to the rug-rat to be;
if not, double condolences to her)."  30 Apr 2005

28- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to
honest and honorable people apply to him.  That is absurd.
He is the biggest liar in Usenet history.  Mackay posted the
email to prove Snit was using sock puppets and he still is.
Snit can not give up his socks puppets and shills.  They are
the only ones who ever support him."  28 Jan 2009

29- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're
the worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar
and a forger, and you've almost destroyed this group
single-handedly. For you to post a list of out of context
arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies labled
as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need
to be center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd
if you thought it would make people look at you."  18 May 2007

30- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric
help. Go see a doctor."  24 Aug 2006

31- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to
the points in my post and you are back to your repetitious
regurgitation mode. How childishly typical of you, Snit."
16 Nov 2004

32- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled
since the first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do
like Snit'. As far as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist."
15 Aug 2009

33- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been
coming to CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among
people, besides the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I
feel that it is like being in a room of really young children
trying there best to best the other person. The one common
thing among all of this seems to be you.  I hate to be like
this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a
great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs
and more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no
end then all this picking at each other on such a personal
level. CSMA has always been al little adversarial but you
have personally crank it up to the point that this place is
no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making
this place your own personal circus."  12 Jan 2006

34- Geezer: Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those
who uncover his lies and deceit;)" Snit: "and no clue about
the law."  Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported
opinions are "proof".  LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported
lies)'  1 Jan 2009

35- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still*
showing how stupid he is... What a mar00n".  30 Aug 2008

36- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with
the Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He
will drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted
need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts,
set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!"   27 Oct 2004

37- gimme_this_gimme_that: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"
4 Mar 2007

38- Glenn Hall (COLA): "That person is like a constantly running
toilet that won't stop. Does he ever stop talking about UI
consistency? No matter what anyone replies, he adds a few more
branches to the spider web as it grows and grows. It's a waste
of time."  31 Oct 2010

39- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone
else notices that you are not honest and you have no honor."
21 Jan 2006

40- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate
threads, are you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I
dont ever censor people cause that's just retarded but if you
dont fix it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your name
40 times in a row. So uh, change your client or something".
12 Sep 2004

41- Hadron (COLA): "Would you please stop the whining. FFS he
has you jumping to his every post. How many more fucking times
are you going to post the same repetitive garbage? Please
least change the record sometimes!!!!!!!"  13 Aug 2010

41- Hadron (COLA): "I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I
have Snit killfiled for his repeated reposts of the same text
time and time again."  24 Aug 2011

41- Hadron (COLA): Snit: "Anyone who denies this is a part of
the herd.  Period.  This is a simple black and white issue where
there is no middle ground - anyone who lies to defend Stallman's
repulsive support of child abuse *is* a part of the herd."
Hadron: "Constantly posting this dirge about Stallman and his
views is about to get you back in the killfile. Stop it. Its
repulsive and vindictive on your part."  25 Sep 2011

42- Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must be a deeply
troubled individual who has a fragile ego. I needn't agree
nor disagree with the points above. I don't care about
them. Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc., wars
with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls,
arise from your sense that any conversation or thread must
orbit around you. People have pointed that out to you but you
don't accept that.  Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and
see a doctor about your solipsism. There must be a cure for
you deep psychological travail."  18 Aug 2006

43- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"  Aug 19 2004

44- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
definition of "synonymous".  It is, however, a very clear
example of how you attempt to maliciously debase against anyone
who disagrees with you.  As such, I consider this to be a
purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.  This is your only
warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the reminder
that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the
word "responsible".'  25 Feb 2008

45- High Plains Thumper: "Agreed except for Snit and socks (Joe
Crump and ad nauseum). I've got Snit kill binned, because he
is the classic ad hominem troll. At first he seems reasonable,
but then it always degrades into name calling bullying, the
responder is a liar, etc. AKA the Snit Circus of Pathological
Lies. Perhaps the times he seems reasonable are when he is
properly controlled by medication."  21 Sep 2010

46- Homer (COLA): "I don't mean this as a personal insult,
but I'm perfectly serious when I say 'Snit' (Michael Glasser)
is obviously mentally ill, and needs help.  I was going to
suggest that someone alerts his wife to the problem, but I
have to assume she's already aware of his condition, if she
is in fact still living with him. It's possible, I suppose,
that he's already undergoing counselling and/or on medication,
but if he is then it doesn't seem to be helping much.  Maybe he
just missed his 'meds' today (again, I mean that sincerely)."
26 Jan 2009

Homer: "Word of advice for anyone concerned: don't be tempted
to get drawn into a Snit circus, it's literally a waste of
time. He's just an attention seeker who'll keep stringing you
along, in a never-ending circle of obtuse questions, for which
he has no genuine interest in the answers."  14 Oct 2010

47- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting
to CSMA for a long time now, since 1995 at least. There have
always been trolls and morons, but I've never seen anything
quite so disruptive as the Snit circus. Snit will *never*
back down or stop, and neither will most of his opponents.
A good kill file is your only hope."  20 Aug 2009

48- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable
to offer support for your statements, you're reduced to
personal attacks on me.  Incidentally, anyone reading this
post can see that I have offered no straw men, and have only
asked you to explain how the things you state as facts can
be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have
some insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long
posts and avoid answering any of the questions I asked by
saying everything was just repeated."  6 Dec 2006

49- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid
people on usenet that should be confined most likely. You
sit there and refresh your screen endlessly. You post the
same nonsense over and over.  Either you're a super troll,
or you're a super mess."  1 Nov 2004

50- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."  27 Feb 2006

51- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
23 Dec 2005

52- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not
a 12-step recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions
won't help me achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In
fact, it detracts from it and those kinds of discussions have
no place in a newsgroup such as this."  18 Nov 2004

53- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you
accomplishing besides being annoying? Is that your goal?"
25 Apr 2007

54- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush
mentioned in it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on
topic and not hijack threads."

55- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're
involved in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens
of responses to OT things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone
has to take the lead and stop this crap. Try. How about it?"
25 Apr 2006

56- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away,
rather than actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for
the course I suppose."

"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce
evidence for his claims.  At least come up with some
original insults Snit! I mean, you *are* capable of original
thoughts! Right? Snit?"  8 Feb 2008

57- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to
fall - in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight,
yelling at passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'"  23 Mar 2005

58- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What
are you bitching about?"  1 Dec 2005

59- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice-
more like a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never
again even entertain an unkind thought re Apple, will you take
it back and lock it up?  Please??"  11 Mar 2005

60- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's
postings since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to
filter his posts, I just consider the source and skip to the
next one when I see his name."  7 Jan 2004

61- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be
shocked that he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff
about being a computer repairman and teacher. He's just plain
loony and best ignored. Let him deal with his disorder by
medication. He's here to do one thing, get attention from
people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what
he's counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes
to get a rise out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't
regret it."  3 Apr 2007

John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without
adding drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage
to get out of my killfile? Oh well back into the cage you
go, PLONK."  13 Oct 2007

62- Josh McKee: "I have no strawman so therefore it has to be in
your mind. .... What is obnoxious are your posts."  26 Jul 2006

63- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that
even though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll
of the lot is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If
the few stragglers that keep replying to him would just stop
responding to Snit at all this place could be worth coming back
to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his trolling
to more fertile ground."  22 Oct 2006

64- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man.  You started off your
sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.'
29 Oct 2008

65- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother
reading the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding
gobbets of putrid excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how
to support your position, instead of sticking your fingers in
your ears and humming, hoping it'll all go away."  7 Mar 2006

66- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for
ad hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own
ad hominem attacks.  You make silly claims and then avoid the
subject of your silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and
you always have been."  14 Jul 2005

67- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid."  7 Jan 2006

68- Lawrence D'Oliveiro (COLA): "You seem to be full of
complaints about your inability to hold up your end of the
argument, aren't you?"  6 Mar 2011

69- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long
time, but the few times you post something worth reading just
aren't worth it anymore. *plonk*"  16 Dec 2006

70- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact
you've been an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out
with the pretense of trying to be fair, but lately all there
is from you in COLA is trashtalk about Linux and you acting
every bit the troll."  16 Jul 2005

71-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors
CBS News and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent!  Any time
Snit is cornered, he changes the subject and will never admit
he's wrong."  28 Jan 2009

72- libsnightmare: "You're a sore loser who has resorted to
fifth grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left
is to edit posts and post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so
you lie. Once again, you have proved Steve Carroll right about
you. Sad..."  4 May 2009

73- Linonut (cola): "Snit may be the first retraction of my
general killfile amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining,
foot-stomping, back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance
generated by that effete candy-ass beggars belief".  30 Aug 2008

74- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most
cretinous, I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"
18 Mar 2005

75- Lewis: "hasn't this fight been going on for like 8 years
now? I don't think anything is ever going to fix snit."
02 Mar 2010

76- Lusotec (COLA): "You can't resist being a liar, it is
pathological, just like you can't resist trolling these forums
day after day, week after week, month after month, year after
year, decade after decade. A pathetic waste of life." 
Jun 20 2012

77- Marious Barrier (COLA): "I must recognize that it is the
first time I see that kind of troll, once that start asking
moderately serious questions and since the first answer,
gradually starts to degenerate it by, in many failed attempts of
being sarcastic, inserting various indirect insults and calling
all people ignorant and unable to answer what he asks for."
14 Oct 2010

78- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty
starts and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school,
one of the teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her
going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf"
over and over now, and I would not come to help him with his
sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has."  2 Dec 2006

79- Marti Van Lin (COLA): "I paid enough attention to Snit
IMHO. I killfiled him the very first month I started lurking
COLA. I find his nitpicking and immature behavior extremely
annoying. I am not going to torture myself reading his
bullshit. Snit is also a proven liar.  Remember his retarded
exif debacle." 08 Jul 2011

80- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it
to this post since its all about him and he managed to make me
think about him today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went
over to her house and videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute
toddler stuff then burned a DVD of it for her. While we were
watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad because we quit
making him the center of attention and made that kid on the tv
the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life."
30 Sep 2006

81- McGarnagle: "And you know when Snit is endorsed by two of
the biggest nutjobs in AGA - RichL and El Kabong - you know
he's not very bright and a loon." 31 Oct 2008

82- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone
refutes your 'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting
your 'facts' is easily done in this case. I did it, and you
ignored it."  9 Feb 2007

83- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All
I see you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with
everyone. You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not*
a compliment!"  8 Jul 2006

84- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying
here. Instead I can only say that you are a complete and
delusional kook that happens to inhabit CSMA for the time
being. That you are unaware of how deranged you actually behave
further reinforces this notion. Please seek professional help."

"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot
made no threat to you before you went to the police. She
made a promise.  Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out
paranoiac view point, Elizabot was suddenly "threatening"
to you. In so much as you had to take your kooky self down to
your local police shop and blub on their shoulders about how
much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I
bet they have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of
your profile, Snit."  2 Sep 2005

85- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are
all rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely
curious.  Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on."
18 Aug 2006

86- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because
they are off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely
boring and clearly show that you are crying out for attention."
20 Sep 2006

87- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact
that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since
you claimed to KF him.  Killfilling someone generally implies
you're ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually
every reply to him here and and check his website's validation
status more often than most people check their e-mail. These are
not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."  19 Jan 2007

88- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any
pre-school or kindergarten and see if the kids there can't
teach you a thing or two about social behavior."  16 May 2004

89- Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit
retard circus!!!  I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a
thread because that automatically means it's in the toilet."
8 Jul 2009

90- Mutley (AUK): "For the record ... I'll be done when I
decide that there's more shit on your face than there is on
the sole of my shoe."  01 Nov 2009

91- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't
convinced that snit is a total loser, and I rarely call
people losers, I certainly am now. Why bother responding to
his stupidities anyway?"  29 Nov 2004

92- nessuno (COLA): Chris Ahlstrom: "Have you ever noticed that
threads involving Snit, [...] are a basically a waste of time?
nessuno: "Yep. I don't read them."  29 May 2011

93- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got
a wry sense of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way
you're just a waste of time, and you've done more than anybody
to make this group a cesspool.  Then you revel in wallowing
in your own filth."  14 May 2007

94- none of your buisiness (COLA): "I am sorry, but I am going
to have to send you to the bin. You're perpetrating the Snit
circus by responding to all of his assinine posts. He is only
here for one reason, to disrupt this group, & you are helping
him, as well as flatfish."  04 Jan 2011

95- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling
as children in the back seat of the family car saying: Mom,
'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do now
... I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is
that by now you should've grown out of that type of poke and
complain interaction with others. But, of course, you've haven't
learned how to interact with others in a more 'constructive'
and mutually beneficial manner even now."  03 Jul 2007

96- notlisted (COLA): "I actually like Apple.  But I see you as
an asshole who spends an embarassing percentage of your life
posting derogatory comments about a computer operating system
you obviously detest, and insulting those who defend it in a
newsgroup dedicated its advocacy.  That's almost the definition
of being an asshole, and you have half a dozen buddies who
do the same thing.  You excuse what you do by pretending that
you're merely pointing out problems in the hope that the system
will be improved, but that's an obvious lie whether it's you
saying it or one of your buds.  You do it because you enjoy
the feeling it gives you, whatever that is."  07 Mar 2011

97- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry
I killfiled him?"  27 Nov 2006

98- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability
and desire to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial
of things."  2 Oct 2007

99- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher:  Select offending
Author, example Snit...  Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill
this Author' Click 'OK'  Then Repeat with each annoying Author
of your choice.  Then to see your work... Choose the Filter
Menu again, Then 'Refilter Articles'...  Bam! No more boring,
pointless bickering about nothing.  Enjoy!!!!!"  14 Aug 2004

100- Owl (COLA): "You have interacted with me often enough
to know that I never initiate personal attacks.  I generally
respond in kind.  It is you who usually fall off the civility
wagon first, with your ironically condescending canned
responses that do nothing for your argument and generally
shine a spotlight on the desperation that you are so fearful
of projecting."  5 Mar 2011

Owl (COLA): "You are a complete idiot and extremely dishonest.
Consider yourself permanently plonked."  29 Mar 2011

101- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather
discuss something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or,
for that matter, Snit, for whom the work 'troll' seems so
painfully inadequate?"  13 Aug 2006

102- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... "  27 Jun 2006

103- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For
someone who talks about everyone else not being "honest and
honorable" you appear to be the least honest and honorable of
anyone here."  22 Apr 2007

104- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in
Newswatcher but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option
with Snit. Ten seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004

105- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take
your argument with sandman into the private room."  13 Dec 2006

106- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely,
and someti...  err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a
blue moon he has something useful to say."  20 Mar 2007

107- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that
they were not different windowing environments? Message-ID,
please. Experience has told me not to trust you on anything
without backing evidence."  30 Jun 2005

108- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot Glasser is invading this
group with his inane drivel, so he has to bear what people
think about that dishonest retard. And just for the record:
You *are* a Glasser sock" 30 Jan 2010

109- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".  30 Mar 2008

110- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get
superficial snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions."
1 Nov 2004

111- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference
a long standing war you have going with some person from
csma. It's like you single out persons to target your attentions
upon and then continuously berate them with constant barbs
and goads to perpetuate their acrimonious responses, which in
turn you respond in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above all things,
your affinity for Macs and your overbearing pompous nature
aside, this is what convinces me that your primary purpose
for frequenting this and other groups is to troll."  07 Sep 2005

112- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."  20 Jun 2006

113- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant
one. You trash people that are trying their level best to
cope with a horrendous situation. And you do it without the
slightest idea of what is going on."  06 Sep 2005

114- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is
a troll. I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However,
as a troll, he is ... somewhat clumsy."  22 Mar 2005

115- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care
if you quote Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate
perched on the shell of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out
that you run the risk of looking ridiculous when you quote
something patently stupid. If that's your goal, you're on the
right track, and more power to you."  11 Jan 2006

116- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue,
who's thing is twisting your words so he can win an argument
against a straw man.  That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009

RonB: (COLA): "Why do you bother responding to Snit? He makes
no point, he simply gainsays whatever you say. Just another
version of Hadron's 'you're a liar' mantra, which is about
all he can muster nowadays."  27 May 2010

RonB (COLA): "Original subject line now killfiled. You can
only talk about the freaking clipboard for so many million
freaking messages. As I said, Snit has no common-sense, STOP
mechanism. He's a mechanically obsessive super crank and will
go on forever. I'm not kidding about this, he will *NEVER*
*ever* stop."  6 Mar 2011

117- Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir
boys."  14 Sep 2009

118- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter
category.  Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose
of hoping to generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn
more about Linux and how it can help you and your supposed
users why aren't you requesting help from a more technical
Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As the old saying goes,
those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts seem to
confirm that saying IMHO."  12 Mar 2005

119- S'mee (Keith, "Liar...forger and
worthless. You must be related to our resident racist troll,
he lies as much as you."  29 Dec 2008

120- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the
-HISTORY- of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost
hated, in a news group before. He has the ability to turn just
about any person against him in just a few posts. On usenet,
trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is that
I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll -
damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they
are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour."
18 Mar 2005

121- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere
nice. Honestly, even the nutters who hang out down on Brighton
seafront made more sense than this. You been doing drugs
or something?"  25 May 2006

122- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit,
you're probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that
promises to remove smut from your harddrive."  21 Jan 2005

123- Sermo Malifer (COLA): Snit: "Why do so many people in
COLA argue *against* me..."  Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a
narcissistic troll who posts trash just to get people talking
about you."  21 Jan 2009

124- spike1: "As for the original post, there's plenty of reason
thought and criteria. The reason is snit's here. The thought is
probably to show everyone here just how bad a troll snit is."
03 Dec 2006

125- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem
expressing anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in
other ways. and he thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is
there and he figures he's pretty smart. indeed, he tells us,
he's done the personality tests and the iq tests and he's
okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted."
3 Mar 2004

126- Steel (COLA): "You may not like the game, but nevertheless,
it's just a game. You play a game yourself don't kid yourself."
14 Oct 2010

127- Steve Carroll: "Snit isn't much more than a one trick
pony and not telling the whole story is one of his two main
tricks. His other main trick is to outright lie. Sprinkle in
a bit of denial and you've gone a long way towards defining
his MO.  The idea that Snit admits to his errors is one of
the biggest jokes on usenet."  28 Feb 2010

128- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece
of elephant dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up
in the "Snit Circus", but then the cotton candy began to sour,
and CSMA begun to smell like elephant dung."  18 Aug 2004

129- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility
with me for your rediculous argument regarding this."
26 Sep 2006

130- Steve Travis: "Oh oh...  Now look what we've done.  Snit
has lost all self respect and has sunk to the point of using
words like 'asses' when referring to others.  Oh, how could
the morally superior snit have fallen so low..  Please take a
moment out of your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him.
Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more happy glue
(and the appropriate plastic bags)."  27 Mar 2005

131- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk
him then.  A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be."
15 Aug 2006

132- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another
attempt to troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again".
28 Aug 2008

133- thanatoid: "Is business/personal life/etc. SO bad that you
had to create Snit? I really thought higher of you until Snit
came in here, in fact I find your site very nice and wish there
was a shop like yours where I live (well, I /think/...) Or is
Snit really just someone whose HD you accidentally wiped? Either
way, it seems to have created a lot of, for lack of a better
word, unpleasantness - just from looking at today's headers."
02 Jul 2008

134- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my
killbin, I can't be doing with him."  27 Jan 2009

135- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're
the one lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically
amount to "I'm right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples
someone points at to demonstrate their claim, you blindly
continue to insist that they provide no evidence, or that
the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse still, you fall back
on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to portray the
argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that
inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason
than you are."  23 Sep 2006

136- Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your
"proof"?  Again, your assertion that no one has done so is
even *less* convincing than your claim that some PDF "proves"
whatever point you're trying to make precisely because I'm
familiar with your MO. That is, you're a dumb-ass who would
claim that that something is proved when it's not, and who
would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I
don't know what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know
that you're full of shit."  21 Aug 2008

137-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you
see, you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really
are. Why just the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you,
the king of liars (in this NG anyway) calling somebody else
a liar."  13 Nov 2004

138- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way
the poor sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's
taken to hanging out with and supporting racist pig fuckers
like MuahMuah. It is true that no-one likes him and those that
pretend they do are just using him or don't know him - but
come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some compassion,
eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy, MuaaaahMuaaah,
and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every one
of them"  19 Apr 2006

139- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way
you could actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to
troll here."  14 Apr 2006

140- Timberwoof: "Plonk, Snit."  23 Apr 2006

141- tom_elam: "Killfile Steve C. and Snit"  07 Jul 2006

142- TomB (COLA): "No Snit, you were flat out lying in an
attempt to make me look bad. Do you really have to sink to
that level in order to 'be right'? If so, you're pathetic. And
I don't say this because I like to say it."  07 Feb 2010

143- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in
into one of your Circus acts?"  20 Feb 2006

144- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was:
Stop polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive
"writings". You give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your
goal you have succeeded!  That also goes for all that bullshit
on your website"  11 Jun 2004

145- Tony(UK) (COLA): "Your email address in your headers just
about sums the Linux world up. Nothing to do with the OS, it
is the *uckwits involved in the whole arena and have posted
before on this. If in doubt, deride, insult and attack. Look
inwardly carefully before judging me."  10 Dec 2009

146- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with
Snit.  Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't
mostly restrict their responses to 'why don't you go away,
no one wants you here'. Just what would keep someone in this
group with all of that animosity? Must be some kind of severe
mental illness."  17 Mar 2005

147- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty"
are nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you
wish to define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt
to alter or bend the rules when inevitably things do not go to
your liking, for this reason I doubt anyone would be foolish
enough to play your game."  16 May 2004

148- White Spirit (COLA): "Snit deserves a good beat-down,
Rodney King style. I have had to plonk the worthless piece of
Snit to prevent my monitor being defiled with the presence of
his idiotic, narcissistic tripe."  24 Aug 2011

149- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home
more than he's anywhere near a classroom".

150- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a
mental breakdown it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit
Glasser. What a f#cked up mess he is."  29 Aug 2008

151- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my
sincere apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're
the first person to be plonked from my new computer!  :-)
10 Feb 2005

152- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"  14 Jun 2004

153- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of
posts, to prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like
that to people without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly,
in the record. Ping Snit to do a search - you will flatter him,
and give meaning to his tawdry little life."  25 Oct 2006

154- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global
killfile.  No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye".
11 Sep 2004

155- Znu: "The Snit Circus has gotten particularly bad as of
late.  When I set up my filters to kill all of Snit's posts,
plus direct replies to them (which is how I'm keeping things
from now on), nearly 40% of the most recent 1000 articles in
CSMA go out the window. .... In all, something like 50% of the
traffic in this group is now related to Snit insanity. .... I
killfile Edwin because I don't have a patience to have
discussions with someone who deliberately tries to waste
my time. But watching *other people* tie him knots can be
entertaining. The Snit-related posts are not like this. They
are endless repetitions of the exact same material and/or
arguments dating back *years* about who said what."  20 Apr 2008

156- Kari Lane (COLA): "You are pitiful. And a big pain in
the ass.  Without you there might be change to get some real
discussion going on about Linux."  27 Aug 2011

157- Roy Schestowitz (COLA): "Your neighbour troll has gotten 
no attention, so he decided to start spamming our site, having 
trolled the IRC channel. He has just posted 7 non-content 
self-promotion links in a matter of 5 minute (as comments), 
The trolling and stalking elsewhere have verged the pathological 
too. S*it Glasser -- see help. You're clearly insane." [...] 
"The Prescott Lunattic has just pasted his ENTIRE BLOG into my 
blog (as comments). If this is not an UBERTROLL, I don't know 
what is.  31 Aug 2011

157- Roy Schestowitz (COLA): "He is piggy-backing other people's
sites for attention. Frankly, he's the most disgusting form
of troll and no wonder even the Mac forums disowned him. He's
a real-life troll."  31 Aug 2011

158 - 7 (COLA): "You went off topic, run, back down, accepted
you are a HYPOCRITE, trolled, posted net abuse and underlined
your illiterate character, ignored the answer, made false
accusation and trolled again."  23 Nov 2011

159 - DFS (COLA): "About Snit? If so, I was fooled by him for
a long time, too, mostly because I didn't closely read his
threads. I knew he liked to split hairs and argue endlessly,
so I usually glossed over his threads. I didn't realize he
would keep babbling "Support your accusation" even in the face
of direct evidence of his lies. Oh well.  I finally decided
to killfile him again (my only entry)."  27 Mar 2012

160 - Torre Starnes (COLA): DFS: "About Snit?"  Torre Starnes:
"Yep. I admit I was sucked in. In the dumper....."  27 Mar 2012

161 - clogwog (COLA): "This discussion, a very boring one,
is leading nowhere, please try to accept that cc has his
arguments to disagree with you."  31 May 2012

162 - Don Zeigler (COLA)

"Hopefully none of Snot's family, friends or business associates
will ever run across this thread archived on Google. It's the
most shining example yet of his obviously unbalanced mental
state. He's told so many whoppers he can't even keep his story
straight." Jan 16 2009

163 - Gregory Shearman (COLA)

"Just killfile the troll, don't engage it." - Oct 13 2010